Saturday, December 7, 2019

Statement of Vandy Koker Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Statement of Vandy Koker. Answer: Statement of Vandy Koker Before completing the group assignment, I was a bit worried when I found out that it was going to be a group assignment that required the input of each and every group member. This implied that we had to work as a team in order to ensure that our group became successfully in the assignment[1] .Working in a team environment where most people are strangers to each other always brings out the nerves because for one, it is quite apparent that most of the university students do not like to work in groups and those that do like working in group work actually came from the same high school and they already knew each other well[2]. As a result, this makes or leaves the rest of us that are new to Australia by ourselves to become scared with the realisation that we are not going to find a partner to work with whom we know each other since childhood or even attended similar schools. But luckily as I was late to find a group there were two other people did not have a group as well so I met Ibrah im and Johanna[3]. Initially, it is a common fact that working in a group of people who are not well acquainted with each other makes us to experience various stages that are experienced in group formation[4]. At first, we experienced some sort of conflicts since each of the group members had different likes and dislikes. However, as time progressed, we came to know each other well and thus were able to comfortably work on the assignments with great easy[5]. It is important to note that fact that despite the fact that the three of us each had different ways of working, it was quite beneficial that our way of thinking, reasoning, and articulation of issues was quite similar and therefore this was indeed a significant aspect that highly contributed in the success of working on our assignments[6]. It is prudent to note that even though the we were late to select a team because of lack of the correct combination, and that got me worried a lot, and I bet the rest of the group members were too but the day we met took all the worries out of my mind because we seamlessly worked together and allocated what each of us was going to do and so on[7]. In order to ensure the success of our assignment, it was quite vital to ensure that we allocated our assignments into different manageable tasks and divided responsibilities amongst ourselves. We started with the group contract which we did almost immediately, and in the contract, we split the work amongst each member which I was allocated to do the policies and social effect[8]. Even though we have assigned topics for each member the great thing is that we were all working on it together, for example, Ibrahim was tasked with the full responsibility of ensuring that he found an issue that is not relevant to what he is doing, and instead of forgetting about it he would pass it on to us to see if we also found it to be viable for our group[9]. I believe that the cohesion we have will not only help us to be open with our thoughts and ideas but it will also quite ultimately help in making the general assignment for our group to be quite manageable and simple. I noticed that my weakness was that I had a great and significant tendency of doing more research than I needed and this meant that I had so much junk work and that I had to take out of my work. With the limited time that we had got me worried that I was going to let down the whole of our team, but the rest of the group members were indeed quite helpful in letting me know that I can take my time and cut down the irrelevant research[10]. It was my desire, wish, and aspirations that with time, I will have to work on the weaknesses and ensure that I enhanced all of my strengths so as I succeed in not only my professional life, but also in my academic and personal life. One of the weakness we shared as a whole group would have to be that we formed our group later instead of earlier. This implied that we were very poor in time management skills and therefore there was great need for us to enhance the time and manner in which we did things. As a result, we made a decision that in future, we shall ensure that we are actually at the right time and at the right place[11]. Regardless of what our results turned out to be, I am proud to have had the chance to work with Johanna and Ibrahim and most definitely work with them through our years of university because I believe that we each of us put in one hundred percent of our efforts and commitment[12]. Our strength was the group dynamic, we all were trying to achieve the highest marks that we can get and I believe that not just me but each member of the group took pride in the work that we were able to present in the short time that we had. I think that this shows great determination on our commitment to the passion we put into this assignment and the brilliant ideas that each member brought to the table[13]. I can definitely say that it has open my eyes to different ways that I can and should approach assignments, and that actually enforces that even though we were working on an assignment together we were learning from each other on the way too[14]. Policy and Social Effects Social effect and policy have identified the main stakeholders in when a medical negligence occurs. The main stakeholders are the government, the patients and doctors without any doubt, the patient are the most venerable of the group because their health and in most cases their life is at stake when a medical negligence occurs[15]. In Queensland, a report by the Productivity Commission revealed there were 10 unanticipated events, resulting in death or serious harm, that has occurred in QLD public hospitals between 2014-2015 (third highest in Australia) and a total of 47 unanticipated events occurred between 2010-2015.[16] The Queensland governments response to the high number of medical negligence claims shows more interest to make medical indemnity affordable for medical practitioners. This is evident as the CLA does not allow victims of medical negligence matters to make any claims with respect to exemplary or punitive damages.[17] It is therefore important to ensure that all the stakeholders are involved with coming up with policies that will enhance peoples lives. One of the hardest social effects of medical negligence is establishing causation and damages by the person in harm[18]. For instance, when it comes to Establishing a duty of care in medical negligence cases is not a challenge for those bringing a civil claim[19]. The effects of the liability laws in the CLA are well evident by the difficulty in establishing causation and damages by the person in harm[20]. References Becker, L., 2014. Working with groups. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 43(2). Beebe, S.A. and Masterson, J.T., 2014. Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. Pearson Higher Ed. Berry, J.M., 2015. Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton University Press. De Bonis, M., Al-Attar, N., Antunes, M., Borger, M., Casselman, F., Falk, V., Folliguet, T., Iung, B., Lancellotti, P., Lentini, S. and Maisano, F., 2015. Surgical andinterventional management of mitral valve regurgitation: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Cardiovascular Surgery and Valvular Heart Disease. European heart journal, 37(2), pp.133-139. Devuyst, O., Drechsler, C., Eckardt, K.U., Emma, F. and Knebelmann, B., 2016. NDT Perspectives Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a position statement on behalf of the ERA-EDTA Working Groups on Inherited Kidney Disorders and European Renal Best Practice. Fidalgo-Blanco, ., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Garca-Pealvo, F.J. and Conde, M.., 2015. Using Learning Analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, pp.149-156. Galegher, J., Kraut, R.E. and Egido, C., 2014. Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Psychology Press. Gansevoort, R.T., Arici, M., Benzing, T., Birn, H., Capasso, G., Covic, A., Devuyst, O., Drechsler, C., Eckardt, K.U., Emma, F. and Knebelmann, B., 2016. Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a position statement on behalf of the ERA-EDTA Working Groups on Inherited Kidney Disorders and European Renal Best Practice. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 31(3), pp.337-348. Garvin, C.D., Gutirrez, L.M. and Galinsky, M.J. eds., 2017. Handbook of social work with groups. Guilford Publications. Haslam, S.A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M.J. and Ellemers, N. eds., 2014. Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Psychology Press. Jeffery, C. ed., 2015. The regional dimension of the European Union: towards a third level in Europe?. Routledge. Josephs, N., Bonnell, T., Dostie, M., Barrett, L. and Henzi, S.P., 2016. Working the crowd: sociable vervets benefit by reducing exposure to risk. Behavioral Ecology, 27(4), pp.988-994. Keating, P.J., 2016. The Working-Classes in Victorian Fiction. Routledge. Kinser, K., 2015. Working at a for-profit: The University of Phoenix. International Higher Education, (28). Klein, J., 2014. Working with Groups (Psychology Revivals): The Social Psychology of Discussion and Decision. Routledge. Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A., 2014. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications. Moore, R., 2015. Nationalizing blackness: Afrocubanismo and artistic revolution in Havana, 1920-1940. University of Pittsburgh Pre. Prescott, S.L., Allen, K., Armstrong, K., Collins, C., Dickinson, H., Gardiner, K., Jacka, F., Jasoni, C., Moore, T., Moritz, K.M. and Muhlhausler, B., 2016. The establishment of DOHaD working groups in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of developmental origins of health and disease, 7(5), pp.433-439. Seferovi?, P.M., Stoerk, S., Filippatos, G., Mareev, V., Kavoliuniene, A., Risti?, A.D., Ponikowski, P., McMurray, J., Maggioni, A., Ruschitzka, F. and Veldhuisen, D.J., 2013. Organization of heart failuremanagement in European Society of Cardiology member countries: survey of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the Heart Failure National Societies/Working Groups. European journal of heart failure, 15(9), pp.947-959. Stocker, T. ed., 2014. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.